<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Importance of business continuity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.alvinlim.info/2009/01/12/importance-of-business-continuity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.alvinlim.info/2009/01/12/importance-of-business-continuity/</link>
	<description>Dare to dream !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:34:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvin Lim</title>
		<link>http://blog.alvinlim.info/2009/01/12/importance-of-business-continuity/comment-page-1/#comment-4262</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvin Lim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alvinlim.info/?p=1286#comment-4262</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@ Damien&lt;/b&gt;
Actually, I&#039;m not sure what is system redundancy or procedural redundancy. :D What I know is that if a business is relying on IT system, then please ensure there&#039;s a proper backup plan just in case that reliable IT system fails. Such unlucky things do happen. The TESCO incident, they do have a backup plan - doing manual calculation...and everything manual. It&#039;s quite troublesome for the customers but it&#039;s better than my experience with Maybank when all the bank tellers disappeared because of the blackout. No power = no system = no work. My transaction was halted halfway...and I could not leave. I just sat there waiting for 2 hours. =_=

That was the last time I actually went to their branch. Since then, i will only use the ATM and Maybank2U, if i were to deal with Maybank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@ Damien</b><br />
Actually, I&#8217;m not sure what is system redundancy or procedural redundancy. <img src='http://blog.alvinlim.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  What I know is that if a business is relying on IT system, then please ensure there&#8217;s a proper backup plan just in case that reliable IT system fails. Such unlucky things do happen. The TESCO incident, they do have a backup plan &#8211; doing manual calculation&#8230;and everything manual. It&#8217;s quite troublesome for the customers but it&#8217;s better than my experience with Maybank when all the bank tellers disappeared because of the blackout. No power = no system = no work. My transaction was halted halfway&#8230;and I could not leave. I just sat there waiting for 2 hours. =_=</p>
<p>That was the last time I actually went to their branch. Since then, i will only use the ATM and Maybank2U, if i were to deal with Maybank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Tan</title>
		<link>http://blog.alvinlim.info/2009/01/12/importance-of-business-continuity/comment-page-1/#comment-4252</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alvinlim.info/?p=1286#comment-4252</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t sure if you were refering to systems redundancy at first but I guess you were. Its a good point. From a risk management perspective, a company that relies 100% of its operations on systems - even with redundancies -  will not get very high marks because 100% system dependence means there is 0% manual option if the system goes down. We&#039;re familiar with service counters that hang up that infamous &quot;System down&quot; sign, and staff will disappear for coffee and money can&#039;t be collected while the IT guys are fixing the breakdown. That&#039;s a sign of a badly designed business. 

Procedural redundancy is actually as important as system redundancy but I find it the most  overlooked area in biz continuity. I guess becoz most IT co&#039;s selling disaster recovery systems are only interested in selling their DRP solutions and couldn&#039;t care less about the full picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t sure if you were refering to systems redundancy at first but I guess you were. Its a good point. From a risk management perspective, a company that relies 100% of its operations on systems &#8211; even with redundancies &#8211;  will not get very high marks because 100% system dependence means there is 0% manual option if the system goes down. We&#8217;re familiar with service counters that hang up that infamous &#8220;System down&#8221; sign, and staff will disappear for coffee and money can&#8217;t be collected while the IT guys are fixing the breakdown. That&#8217;s a sign of a badly designed business. </p>
<p>Procedural redundancy is actually as important as system redundancy but I find it the most  overlooked area in biz continuity. I guess becoz most IT co&#8217;s selling disaster recovery systems are only interested in selling their DRP solutions and couldn&#8217;t care less about the full picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
